Messiah’s Covenant Community Church NYC (where Steve Schlissel is pastor) has posted my article on justification and the Federal Vision on their front page. I must admit to being encouraged at the positive response that my post has received in various quarters. Trying to give an adequate description of FV approaches to justification is a daunting task.

If you visit Messiah’s website, take the time to look around. There are some helpful articles and sermon notes available there. Steve Schlissel also has a large number of encouraging and challenging sermons available at SermonAudio.

Posted in Controversies | 2 Comments

René Girard Videos

René Girard
There are some René Girard videos on this site. If you don’t know who Girard is, you are really missing out.

Posted in Lectures | Leave a comment

Jeff Meyers on AAPC/FV/NPP Part 3

Part of the problem here is that many of the critics define the Reformed tradition extremely narrowly and do not appreciate any insights from outside the English-Scottish Presbyterian and Puritan world. So to them, these views really are “new” and challenge their comfort zone. They haven’t encountered this kind of Presbyterianism in their narrow reading and study. At the same time, I’d want to insist that even the things that might be genuinely new (e.g., I think Peter Leithart and Jim Jordan have truly broken new ground in several areas over the years) are essentially organic outgrowths of the tradition. In other words, this is not a de novo trajectory; we’re just riding out old trajectories to a further point. The example of paedocommunion is a good case study: it has a history, tracing back to the early church; it’s also consistent with the basic principles of Reformed ecclesiology, even if virtually none of the Reformers believed it. It’s at once old and new.

Those who think they are just confessing the “vanilla Westminster tradition” are, in my opinion, a bit naive. John Leith’s book on the Westminster Assembly does a really fine job showing how embedded the WCF is in the culture and philosophy of its day. Jordan dealt with this in the essay I referenced in Part 3. There is not a single person in 21st-century America who actually thinks like a mid-17th century British person. We cannot recreate the past; history is a river that only flows in one direction. Even those who are most rigidly traditionalist are really mentally updating the confession in a variety of ways, whether they are aware of it or not.

Read the whole of part 4 here.

Posted in Controversies | Leave a comment

The Background of Pentecost

Pieter Bruegel the Elder - The Tower of Babel

Pieter Bruegel the Elder – The Tower of Babel

Old Testament and Gospels Background

In studying the event of Pentecost it is important that we clearly understand the background to the narrative of Acts. Many people have not grasped anything remotely near the full significance that the NT gives to the event of Pentecost, largely through their failure to appreciate the deep OT background to the event.

The OT background to the events of Pentecost is not limited to one genre of OT literature, nor is it limited to one particular time period. The early followers of Christ would have understood Pentecost as an event that drew its significance from the OT narrative as a whole as well as from certain parts in particular. As we establish this background, many popular and academic myths that persist about the character of Pentecost will be dispelled. Continue reading

Posted in NT Theology, Theological | 19 Comments

Morris Dancing
Oh, please no!

Posted in In the News | Leave a comment

Jeff Meyers on AAPC/FV/NPP Part 2

Some of the terminology and phraseology is new. I’d admit that. But again, this should be no problem. That’s one of the great things about “system” confessional subscription. We don’t bind ourselves to a particular forms of words, just to the overall content. So we have freedom to reformulate biblical truth for the context in which we’re called to minister. I learned this view of theology from Dr. Jones at Covenant Seminary when he made us read John Frame’s Doctrine of the Knowledge of God. This was a formative book in my theological development. His definition of theology as “application” means that our theology will always be “new” as we apply the unchanging Word of God to genuinely new situations. I think that’s what’s happening today. To insist on using archaic terms, phrases, and language to communicate God’s Word to today’s world is a kind of idolatrous refusal to live in and serve the world God has given us at his moment in time. Living in the past, escaping into our own romantic conceptions of 16th or 17th century church life has always been a temptation to Reformed people.

Read the whole post here.

Posted in Controversies, The Blogosphere | Leave a comment

Quotable Quotes

Just when I though that Joel’s Aristotle quote (”It is the mark of an educated mind to be to able to entertain a thought without accepting it”) was the best quote that I had come across all day, along comes Paul with this gem:—

“Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.”
True that.

It took me a little while to figure out where I had heard this before. Which reminds me, if you haven’t already seen this, you must do so now.

Posted in The Blogosphere | 4 Comments

Christians in Iraq

The US and the UK are not necessarily on our side. Worth remembering.

Posted in What I'm Reading | 2 Comments

Radical Orthodoxy And the Reformed Tradition: Creation, Covenant, And Participation
I look forward to reading this book.

Posted in What I'm Reading | 3 Comments

Jeff Meyers on AAPC/FV/NPP

Part 1. Well worth reading.

Posted in Controversies | Leave a comment