Jeff Meyers on AAPC/FV/NPP Part 2

Some of the terminology and phraseology is new. I’d admit that. But again, this should be no problem. That’s one of the great things about “system” confessional subscription. We don’t bind ourselves to a particular forms of words, just to the overall content. So we have freedom to reformulate biblical truth for the context in which we’re called to minister. I learned this view of theology from Dr. Jones at Covenant Seminary when he made us read John Frame’s Doctrine of the Knowledge of God. This was a formative book in my theological development. His definition of theology as “application” means that our theology will always be “new” as we apply the unchanging Word of God to genuinely new situations. I think that’s what’s happening today. To insist on using archaic terms, phrases, and language to communicate God’s Word to today’s world is a kind of idolatrous refusal to live in and serve the world God has given us at his moment in time. Living in the past, escaping into our own romantic conceptions of 16th or 17th century church life has always been a temptation to Reformed people.

Read the whole post here.

About Alastair Roberts

Alastair Roberts (PhD, Durham University) writes in the areas of biblical theology and ethics, but frequently trespasses beyond these bounds. He participates in the weekly Mere Fidelity podcast, blogs at Alastair’s Adversaria, and tweets at @zugzwanged.
This entry was posted in Controversies, The Blogosphere. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.