Podcast: The Four Loves, Part Five: Charity

Posted on December 19, 2016 by

Mere FidelityThis week, we conclude our discussion of C.S. Lewis’ superb book The Four Loves with a discussion of his chapter on the subject of Charity.

You can also follow the podcast on iTunes, or using this RSS feed. Listen to past episodes on Soundcloud and on this page on my blog.

About Alastair Roberts

Alastair Roberts (PhD, Durham University) writes in the areas of biblical theology and ethics, but frequently trespasses beyond these bounds. He participates in the weekly Mere Fidelity podcast, blogs at Alastair’s Adversaria, and tweets at @zugzwanged.
This entry was posted in Christian Experience, Culture, Doctrine of God, Ethics, My Reading, Podcasts, Theological. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Podcast: The Four Loves, Part Five: Charity

  2. quinnjones2 says:
    December 20, 2016 at 12:41 pm

    When writing about caritas I don’t think that Lewis mentioned the love of Jesus Christ, and I wonder why he didn’t? (I have just re-read this chapter quickly, so I may have missed something!) Matthew A.’s comment that ‘God is not vulnerable to loss or degradation’ does not really seem to apply to Jesus, who came to us as a vulnerable and dependent baby, who said ‘I thirst’ as he hung on the cross dying, and who was wounded for our transgressions. I also have on my mind the words of Jesus ‘Greater love has no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.’ I tend to think that this can also mean laying down one’s life in a non-literal sense – for instance, putting aside one’s own interests (possessions, reputation, pet hobbies and so on) for the sake of a loved one. So maybe Lewis’s statement ‘To love at all is to be vulnerable’ is true up to a point but it may be truer to say that when we love we can choose to become vulnerable but that vulnerability does not necessarily flow from love?

    Reply
    • Alastair Roberts says:
      December 20, 2016 at 6:00 pm

      Jesus was clearly vulnerable to loss and degradation, but this was in his human nature, not in his divine nature. There are clearly problems with drawing too direct a line between human love and divine love in such respects, which is part of what Matt was getting at. However, Lewis was principally speaking about human love.

      Reply
  3. quinnjones2 says:
    December 20, 2016 at 11:39 pm

    Thank you for putting that so clearly Alastair. Thank you.

    Reply

  4. Pingback: Retrospective on 2016 | Alastair's Adversaria

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.