Eschatologically Weighted Ontology and the Fall

Maximus writes this section in a metaphysical idiom, but his argument helps fill out the importance of recognizing the eschatological aspiration that was inherent in Adam’s situation.  If Adam was fulfilled, perfected from the outset, then we are almost inevitably left with a “fortunate fall” paradigm.  If Adam were fully himself, all that he was going to be, from his first creation, but left that place of rest, then he needed the fall to attain his most precious possession.  But Genesis 1-2 indicates that Adam was created sinless but immature, a child who had to grow until he was ready to receive the privilege of the tree of knowledge.  He doesn’t fall from fulfilled humanness, or from perfected fellowship with God.  He sins and becomes estranged in childhood, before he has reached his rest.  The fall doesn’t initiate history, sequence, maturation; the fall makes the path of maturation more circuitous.

Read the whole post here.

About Alastair Roberts

Alastair Roberts (PhD, Durham University) writes in the areas of biblical theology and ethics, but frequently trespasses beyond these bounds. He participates in the weekly Mere Fidelity podcast, blogs at Alastair’s Adversaria, and tweets at @zugzwanged.
This entry was posted in Bible, OT, Theological. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Eschatologically Weighted Ontology and the Fall

  1. Pingback: A Better Gospel | Alastair's Adversaria

  2. Pingback: A better gospel – Thinking Theology

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s