Video: Echoes of Exodus in the Great Commission?

Today’s question:

Do you see any parallels between the great commission and the exodus? I don’t want to get Echo-crazy. Just from a surface level, there some to be some connections: confrontation with “the name,” a sending out, baptism, and the nations called to the Lord. Am I crazy, or is there something going on here?

Within this video, I reference the following books and articles:

Peter Leithart, ‘Jesus as Israel: The Typological Structure of Matthew’s Gospel’
Peter Leithart, The Gospel of Matthew Through New Eyes: Volume One—Jesus as Israel
Andrew Wilson and Alastair Roberts, Echoes of Exodus

If you have any questions for me, please leave them on my Curious Cat account. If you have found these videos helpful, please tell your friends. If you would like to support my continued production of them, you can do so on my Patreon account. You can also get the audio of these videos on Soundcloud or iTunes.

About Alastair Roberts

Alastair Roberts (PhD, Durham University) writes in the areas of biblical theology and ethics, but frequently trespasses beyond these bounds. He participates in the weekly Mere Fidelity podcast, blogs at Alastair’s Adversaria, and tweets at @zugzwanged.
This entry was posted in 2 Chronicles, Audio, Bible, Hermeneutics, Joshua, Matthew, NT, NT Theology, OT, OT Theology, Podcasts, Questions and Answers, Theological, Video. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Video: Echoes of Exodus in the Great Commission?

  1. Mike Ford says:

    It seems as if the “original” Exodus from Egypt was meant as a “type” or foreshadowing of the “true” Exodus from “Old Creation” (i.e. “in Adam”) to “New Creation” (i.e. “in Christ”), accomplished by Christ’s redemptive atoning death on the cross for us.

    In that sense, “Exodus” is a motif of “salvation” or redemption, which is why it is repeated so many times in the Bible.

  2. Mike Ford says:

    King Cyrus is a “type” or foreshadow of Jesus (note Isaiah 45:1 – my “annointed”). Cyrus released the Jews from Babylonian captivity as the “type” to the “antitype” of Christs 2nd Coming – This World/Age destroyed [ fall of Babylon] ). Lastly, the “drying up Euphrates” in Revelation 12:13 is “antitype” to the “type” where Cyrus diverted Euphrates River to enter and destroy historical Babylon.
    So his decree in 2 Chronicles 36:23 to “build God a house in Jerusalem” is intentionally foreshadowing Jesus’ Great Commission to the 12 disciples, and its’ consummation at Christ’s 2nd Coming, when New Jerusalem descends from above.
    God Bless!

  3. Mike Ford says:

    So, I’d like to see you do a video on “The Fall of Babylon: In Type (Historical) and Antitype (Christs’ 2nd Coming) !!

    • Mike Ford says:

      Actually, the Antitype noted above has 2 parts: 1) The Great Commission and, 2) Christ’s 2nd Coming to reflect the “already but not yet” nature of the Exodus from Babylon.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.