A new version of my ten questions post from yesterday has just been published over on the Huffington Post (see the original post here).
Ad`ver`sa´ri`a
n. pl.
A miscellaneous collection of notes, remarks, or selections.-
Recent Comments
-
- Home
- About
- Audio and Video
- Books
- Larger Projects
- 40 Days of Exoduses
- Blogging Through Chauvet’s ‘Symbol and Sacrament’
- Notes on John
- Notes on Luke
- On Making a Prophet: Pentecost as Prophetic Installation
- Questions and Answers on Same-Sex Marriage
- Review of Edwin Friedman’s ‘A Failure of Nerve’
- Thoughts on the Evangelical Gospel
- What Is Evangelicalism?
- Mere Fidelity
- Mere Fidelity 001-005
- Mere Fidelity 006-010
- Mere Fidelity 011-015
- Mere Fidelity 016-020
- Mere Fidelity 021-025
- Mere Fidelity 026-030
- Mere Fidelity 031-035
- Mere Fidelity 036-040
- Mere Fidelity 041-045
- Mere Fidelity 046-050
- Mere Fidelity 051-055
- Mere Fidelity 056-060
- Mere Fidelity 061-065
- Mere Fidelity 066-070
- Mere Fidelity 071-075
- Mere Fidelity 076-080
- Mere Fidelity 081-085
- Mere Fidelity 086-090
- Mere Fidelity 091-095
- Mere Fidelity 096-100
- Mere Fidelity 101-105
- Mere Fidelity 106-110
- Mere Fidelity 111-115
- Mere Fidelity 116-120
- Mere Fidelity 121-125
- Mere Fidelity 126-130
- Mere Fidelity 131-135
- Mere Fidelity 136-140
- Mere Fidelity 141-145
- Photos
- Theopolis
- Writings Elsewhere
Wow. And so in the context of the Huff Post’s unabashed total support for Hillary Clinton, your article has become a pro-Hillary piece, despite the line saying you don’t intend to persuade anyone to vote for any particular person.
That’s okay, I guess. I’m just surprised.
I disagree.
When they asked me to write for them, I knew that their stance might be distracting. However, my piece makes clear that I think the standard critics of Trump and his voters dangerously overstate their case, that I am not advocating any candidate, and that my sole concern is that Christian Trump-voters do serious business with their consciences.
Although it may be more difficult for people to read such a piece in the context of the partisan character of the Huffington Post, I hoped that the people it was addressing would be fair-minded enough to, even in that context, temporarily close out the critics and wrestle with their conscience. While it certainly isn’t an ideal location to call people to have such a conversation with themselves, I am more concerned to get the message out to as many potential Christian Trump supporters as possible than I am with doing so under ideal conditions.
I understand your intentions.
I wonder whether the hope for fair mindedness is fainter than usual in the heated atmosphere of this election. 🙂 Certainly, I doubt the Huff Post would be asking you to write for the reasons you outline. But that’s not to say writing for them was a bad idea.
I bore in mind Paul’s approach to speaking the truth in Philippians 1:15-18 and decided that, though I knew the intentions of the HuffPo weren’t mine, the important thing was that I was conveying a message I thought needed to be heard.