A new version of my ten questions post from yesterday has just been published over on the Huffington Post (see the original post here).
Ad`ver`sa´ri`a
n. pl.
A miscellaneous collection of notes, remarks, or selections.My Podcasts and Videos: Adversaria Videos and Podcasts
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
trishjenkins on The Cup of the Adulteress: Und… IT on The Cup of the Adulteress: Und… Thomas on Video: Were Rebekah and Jacob… John on 2021 Retrospective Alastair Roberts on 2021 Retrospective John on 2021 Retrospective Alastair Roberts on Jesus and Jacob Branka on Jesus and Jacob Alastair Roberts on Trinity in Creation Seraphim Hamilton (K… on Trinity in Creation Archives
Categories
Blogroll
- A Living Text
- A Thinking Reed
- Bully's Blog
- Caroline Farrow
- Carpe Cakem!
- Cogito, Credo, Petam
- Colvinism
- Curlew River
- Daniel Silliman
- Dappled Thoughts
- Deo Favente
- Experimental Theology
- Faith and Theology
- Fors Clavigera
- Here's A Thought
- Hierodulia's Blog
- ΚΑΤΑ ΙΩΑΝΝΗΝ
- Jake Belder
- Leithart
- Mere Orthodoxy
- Nothing New Under the Sun
- Passing the Salt Shaker
- Per Crucem ad Lucem
- Reformedish
- Relocating to Elfland
- revmhj
- Scott Schulz
- Shored Fragments
- SimonPotamos
- The Boar's Head Tavern
- The Calvinist International
- The Sword and the Ploughshare
- The Thirsty Gargoyle (Tumblr)
- Theopolis Institute
- Think Theology
- Wedgewords
Follow me on Twitter
My TweetsMeta
Wow. And so in the context of the Huff Post’s unabashed total support for Hillary Clinton, your article has become a pro-Hillary piece, despite the line saying you don’t intend to persuade anyone to vote for any particular person.
That’s okay, I guess. I’m just surprised.
I disagree.
When they asked me to write for them, I knew that their stance might be distracting. However, my piece makes clear that I think the standard critics of Trump and his voters dangerously overstate their case, that I am not advocating any candidate, and that my sole concern is that Christian Trump-voters do serious business with their consciences.
Although it may be more difficult for people to read such a piece in the context of the partisan character of the Huffington Post, I hoped that the people it was addressing would be fair-minded enough to, even in that context, temporarily close out the critics and wrestle with their conscience. While it certainly isn’t an ideal location to call people to have such a conversation with themselves, I am more concerned to get the message out to as many potential Christian Trump supporters as possible than I am with doing so under ideal conditions.
I understand your intentions.
I wonder whether the hope for fair mindedness is fainter than usual in the heated atmosphere of this election. 🙂 Certainly, I doubt the Huff Post would be asking you to write for the reasons you outline. But that’s not to say writing for them was a bad idea.
I bore in mind Paul’s approach to speaking the truth in Philippians 1:15-18 and decided that, though I knew the intentions of the HuffPo weren’t mine, the important thing was that I was conveying a message I thought needed to be heard.