Ad`ver`sa´ri`a
n. pl.
A miscellaneous collection of notes, remarks, or selections.My Podcasts and Videos: Adversaria Videos and Podcasts
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Archives
Categories
Blogroll
- A Living Text
- A Thinking Reed
- Bully's Blog
- Caroline Farrow
- Carpe Cakem!
- Cogito, Credo, Petam
- Colvinism
- Curlew River
- Daniel Silliman
- Dappled Thoughts
- Deo Favente
- Experimental Theology
- Faith and Theology
- Fors Clavigera
- Here's A Thought
- Hierodulia's Blog
- ΚΑΤΑ ΙΩΑΝΝΗΝ
- Jake Belder
- Leithart
- Mere Orthodoxy
- Nothing New Under the Sun
- Passing the Salt Shaker
- Per Crucem ad Lucem
- Reformedish
- Relocating to Elfland
- revmhj
- Scott Schulz
- Shored Fragments
- SimonPotamos
- The Boar's Head Tavern
- The Calvinist International
- The Sword and the Ploughshare
- The Thirsty Gargoyle (Tumblr)
- Theopolis Institute
- Think Theology
- Wedgewords
Follow me on Twitter
My TweetsMeta
This entry was posted in What I'm Reading. Bookmark the permalink.

Fencing the offering plate is a good idea, and biblical. But what does he mean by “young child participation in the Eucharist?” In the context, it sounds like he is still advocating “credo-communion” rather than true paedocommunion. With regard to paedo participation in the Eucharist, the accountability and credo of the parents is enough. “Giving offerings unworthily?” By ourselves, none of us is able to give offerings worthily, but if we have been absolved of our sins by Messiah’s perfect sin offering, then we have been made worthy and we must dedicate ourselves to Yahweh as whole burnt offerings, following which we participate in the peace offering (i.e., the meal in the holy of holies). There is both continuity with the OT sacrifices and also development, of course. Since the offering and the Eucharist are a package deal, both should be fenced off. It does not make good biblical sense to allow a person to participate in only one but not both of those things.