Boggle Online

Boggle
You really would not believe the amount of time that I have wasted on this site over the last few weeks.

Posted in What I'm Reading | 7 Comments

N.T. Wright Oratorio

I presume that a number of you are aware of Paul Spicer’s Easter oratorio, which Wright wrote the words for. Kevin Bush, of the N.T. Wright page (easily one of the best sites online), has provided the words and also has put an article on the website in which Wright reflects on music, theology and his role in the writing of the oratorio.

Posted in Theological | Leave a comment

Are you obsessing about Calvinism?

John Calvin

Marc Heinrich may not entirely share my understanding of what Calvinism is, but he sure writes funny posts.

I must admit, I read more of Calvin and Hobbes than John Calvin nowadays.

Calvin and Hobbes

Posted in The Blogosphere | 3 Comments

News Update

This is my second attempt at this post. The first time I lost everything, just as I was about to publish it.

I am just about to enter into my final week at St Andrews before returning for Christmas. It is strange to think that I have been here for a whole term. My Hebrew exam is now safely behind me. It went well, despite the fact that I probably spent more talking about revision than I actually spent doing it. All my essays have been handed in as well and now I can relax for the rest of the term.

It will be great to go home at the end of next week. I am feeling a bit threadbare at the moment and could benefit from a change of scene — even Stoke-on-Trent will do! — to help me feel a little less flat. Lord-willing I will also be able to have my computer repaired while I am at home, which will enable me to post some more longer posts, including one on Romans 4, which has been waiting on my hard drive for some time now.

I have done less reading over the last week. I have almost finished reading Cornelis van der Waal’s The Covenantal Gospel. It is not easy to arrive at an assessment of the value of this book, considering its age. Almost all of the insights of this book are extremely important ones, but they are all relatively familiar to me. I imagine that I have been exposed to many of these insights through people who originally received them from authors like van der Waal. I have appreciated this book and would recommend it to anyone wanting a solid treatment of the subject. James Jordan’s thoughts on the book are also useful (he encloses them in the book if you order through Biblical Horizons).
Robertson Davies
I have just finished reading the second book in Robertson Davies’ Cornish Trilogy, What’s Bred in the Bone. I read Davies’ Deptford Trilogy about a year ago, and I have enjoyed reading the Cornish Trilogy more (thanks are due to Paul Baxter, who first introduced me to Davies’ work). This probably is largely a result of the fact that my reading of the Deptford Trilogy was interrupted on a number of occasions and also put on hold for a period of time; the Deptford trilogy seems to me to be the better of the two trilogies. I am pretty certain that I will reread both trilogies sometime in the future (I also hope to read the Salterton Trilogy sometime). I find Davies’ insight into human nature and the formation of character very interesting. The complex interweave of the various relationships and roles played by the characters in his novels and the manner in which he traces the unraveling of destinies over long time periods and the decisive actions, events and persons that have served to forge them are probably the features of his work that I find most compelling.

Posted in What I'm Doing, What I'm Reading | 2 Comments

Breaking news on the FV

See here and here.

Posted in The Blogosphere | 1 Comment

Look at its Majesty!
I want one.

Posted in Uncategorized | 6 Comments

Abomination of Desolation

The Orthodox Winnie the Pooh
This is horrible. Although they have long been heading in this direction, the Disney denomination of Pooh followers has finally gone apostate. It seems to me that anyone who has been engaged in the quest for the historical Pooh would be well aware that there is no basis for their position in the tradition.

Posted in What I'm Reading | 4 Comments

Yet Another Meme

OK, I have been tagged, so here goes:

1. Seven things to do before I die
2. Seven things I cannot do
3. Seven things that attract me to my spouse
4. Seven things I say most often
5. Seven books (or series) I love
6. Seven movies I watch over and over again (or would watch over and over if I had the time)
7. Seven people I want to join in, too Continue reading

Posted in What I'm Reading | 4 Comments

Is All of Life Worship?

Jeff has some helpful thoughts here.

I find the analogy of the Church as a body to be an exceedingly fruitful one, particularly in this area. Whilst I lay no claim for a biblical basis for the following sub-analogies, I do find them quite helpful in my own thinking. The Lord’s Day worship of the assembled people of God is akin to a heartbeat. This heartbeat centres on the celebration of the Eucharist. However, the heart does not beat for its own sake alone, but so that the life of Christ might circulate throughout the whole of the body, in all of its parts. The beating heart of the Eucharist will do us little or no good if our lives in whole or in part are cut off from the blood supply of the body of Christ during the week. Whilst all of life is related to worship, there is something unique about the Lord’s Day assembly of the people of God.

The preached Word of God can be compared to nerve signals that give instruction to the various parts of the body and which direct the expression of the life received in the Eucharist. It could also be compared to the breaking down and digesting of food received from the head to sustain the members of the body.

Posted in What I'm Reading | 1 Comment

Priesthood of all Believers

…it is the essence of the priesthood to help people draw near to God. Yes, you get to go into God’s house yourself as a priest. The High Priest even gets to go into the Most Holy Place where Yahweh is enthroned. But whether you are a priest or a High Priest, you only enter the house for someone else. In other words, priests are always helping other people. They are priests to assist others. They are not priests for their own individual selves. The priesthood is about service to others.

Therefore, when the whole of Israel is called “a kingdom of priests” it means that the entire nation has a calling to serve, to assist the nations in drawing near to the true God. Priesthood makes no sense without the other that the priest is called to serve.

What bothers me about the way the priesthood of all believers is commonly conceived in American Protestantism is that it becomes some sort of authorization for the individual believer to worship by his lonesome apart from any help he may give or get from anyone else. But if we are really all called to be priests, then we are called to assist others in drawing near to God. A corollary to this is the fact that we all need the assistance of others when we draw near to God.

So the real thrust of the priesthood of all believers principle is often lost in American individualistic religious thought. Every Christian is a priest comes to mean that we don’t need any help from anyone; it’s just me, God, and my Bible. Don’t tell me that I need help with approaching God! I’m just fine without anyone else’s help! If you say that I need help and assistance, then you are subtly introducing Roman Catholic priesthood again in the church. No one comes between me and Jesus.

But it’s one thing to insist that no one comes between you and Jesus. After all, he is the one mediator between God and man. It’s something else entirely to say that I don’t need anyone to come alongside of me and help me draw near to the Lord.

I’ll say this again in a slightly different way to make the point clear: priests always help others into God’s presence. That’s what the OT priests did at the altar. They didn’t inspect the animals, and help with the preparation of God’s food to feed themselves. They didn’t go into the Tabernacle or Temple for themselves but for others. So if the New Testament says that Jesus is now our high Priest, then he enters God’s heavenly house for us. And he assists us in our approach. But if we are all priests, too, in the image of Jesus, then we also enter for others as well. So saying that Christians are priests does not mean that we don’t need others to help us into God’s house. That’s just what priests do!

The doctrine of the priesthood of all believers means that we also all need one another to exercise that priesthood in service to each other. The pastor is the one who models that behavior because his priestly work is for the whole community. He helps everyone approach God in Christ. As I explained in an earlier post, the pastor is the servant priest ministering to the royal priests.

And people learn how to help others at church. To say we don’t need anyone to help us enter into God’s presence because we are all priests is a contradiction. If that is true, then no one dare exercise his duty as a priest! The priesthood of all believers means that we don’t “go in” alone. We need each other. If this is true, then using the priesthood of all believers to eschew any help from other believers, including the pastor, is to deny the very doctrine you are proclaiming.

Read the rest here (parts 1, 2 and 3 of Jeff Meyers’ series are also helpful).

Posted in What I'm Reading | Leave a comment